Our research projects may greatly vary in theme and scope, but they share an emphasis on the practices of design professionals and users, the processes of city-making, network dynamics, design innovations, and urban borderlands.
This project proposes an alternative methodology for the analysis of architectural drawings and other inscriptive practices. The approach is grounded in the tradition of copying great masters’ work. This is an approach taken in Japanese Calligraphy, the studios of great masters, and the beaux-arts tradition of architectural teaching and practice. Such accounts of drawing are detailed in recent research by anthropologist Fuyubi Nakamura and visual artist Patricia Cain. This copying is intended to be a form of understanding native to the discipline of architecture, where many of the decisions and choices are expressed graphically through sketches, drawings, and plans.
I am studying architectural drawings from major archives and collections (primarily the CCA in Montreal and the RIBA in London) in order to replicate the drawing conventions and methods. The aim is to provide a phenomenological account of the creative process in architecture, to understand the ways in which the lines are made, the order in which they are inscribed. This approach is consistent with my earlier PhD research into notation as a creative practice, where elements of Laban notation were exploited in unusual circumstances such as the Tokyo Subway system, or a scene from Kurosawa’s Seven Samurai.
The key frameworks for the research are anthropologist Tim Ingold’s works on creativity and the line in particular. Ingold’s pioneering of anthropology with creative practice stresses the engagement with the creative practice in question rather than simply sitting back and observing. This necessitates a learning process in which the temporality of the inscriptive practice is examined. Bergson’s work on creativity implicates this temporality as the key characteristic in determining the difference between artistic practices and speculative, scientific problem-solving.
This research will be published as a monograph by Ashgate with the title 'Drawing Parallels: Knowledge Production in Axonometric, Isometric, and Oblique Drawings' and also feed into the BA Humanities teaching at Manchester School of Architecture, through the ongoing commitment to research-led teaching. The research has focused on the following architects’ work: Peter Eisenman, John Hejduk, J. J. P. Oud, James Stirling, and Cedric Price, and addresses the varieties of oblique drawing conventions.
Principal investigator: Albena Yaneva
Funding: Max Plank Institute for the History of Science in Berlin (research fellowship, 2001–2004), Harvard University fellowship (2004-2005), Graham Foundation for Advanced Studies in the Fine Arts, Chicago (2004); Stimuleringsfond voor Architectuur, Netherlands (publication grant, 2009).]
The project provides an account of architectural design as taking place within the interactive networks of designers, models, paints and pixels, material samples and plans that all constitute the design world. By the means of an ethnographical approach that closely interacts with designing architects at the Office of Metropolitan Architecture the project:
- furthers new knowledge about design invention and the nature of design process
- redefines the role of the contemporary architect as an agent acting in the collective and versatile networks of design
The project sets a novel agenda by reconnecting architecture with the design materials and experiences, imagination and making, meaning and materiality. trajectorial nature of design as opposed to design as project realisation.
- Yaneva, A. (2009) The Making of a Building: A Pragmatist Approach to Architecture, Oxford: Peter Lang AG, 227p.
- Yaneva, A. (2009) Made by the Office for Metropolitan Architecture. An Ethnography of Design, Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 120p.
Articles and book chapters
- Yaneva, A. (2005) “Scaling Up and Down: Extraction Trials in Architectural Design,” in Social Studies of Science, 35(6): 867-894.
- Yaneva, A. (2005) “A Building is a Multiverse”, in B. Latour and Weibel P. (eds), Making Things Public, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, pp. 530-535.
- Yaneva, A. (2006) “Shaped by Constraints: Composite Models in Architecture,” in Hinterwaldner, I. and Buschhaus, M. (eds.) The Picture’s Image. Wissenschaftliche Visualisierung als Komposit, München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, pp.68-84.
- Yaneva, A. (2007) “Towards a New Understanding of Architecture of Addition: The Unrealized Extensions of Whitney Museum of American Art”, in M. Swenarton, I. Troiani and H. Webster (eds.), The Politics of Making, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Books Ltd, pp. 159-168.
- Yaneva, A. (2010) “A Building Trajectory”, in Gagliardi, P., Latour, B. and Memmelsdorff, P. (eds.), Coping with the Past. Creative perspectives on Conservation and Restoration, Venice: Leo S. Olschki, Civiltà Veneziana Studi, pp.17-45.
Excerpts from reviews
- “This book is an important experiment in describing and understanding architecture and design, precisely because of the significance Yaneva allocates to day-to-day practice: designing is largely a mundane activity, and this book is almost revolutionary in analysing that.” Robbert van Strien in Items #1 2010
- “Yaneva arrives at convincing conclusions that can indeed make you look at the work of OMA in another way. The way in which models are used and qualities and characteristics are ascribed to them is hilarious. Yet Yaneva convincingly concludes that the model can have a mind of its own.” Joost Zonneveld at Archined, 23 March 2010
- “Finally, an ethnography of design! Banham would be pleased to read Yaneva’s ethnographic account of the ‘tribe’ of architects housed in their ‘tribal longhouse’ on the Heer Bokkelweg.” Edwin Garner at Archis.org, 29 March 2010.
- “In her book, Made by the Office for Metropolitan Architecture, Albena Yaneva reveals how an interest in the latter, the processes of making and the mechanisms by which ideas and models can migrate within an office environment, has informed some of the most influential architecture of the 21st Century so far.” Blueprint, OMA Remakes Architecture” by Adrian Friend, 23 February 2010.
RIBA President's Award for Outstanding University-located Research (2010).
- Principal investigator: Ray Lucas
- Dates: April 2017, January 2018
- Funding: University of Manchester / University of Aberdeen, Journal of Development Studies & Global Development Institute / ERC £2,250 Workshop Grant + Matched funding from KFI
This two-day workshop has been followed by a second event in January 2018.
The aim was to look at different forms of geometry and how they inform cognition. A group of artists, architects, anthropologists and mathematicians gathered to discuss various themes from bodily geometries through to robotics and LIDAR sensing. A keynote was given by Tim Ingold, and practical workshops led by Jaime Refoyo; Ricardo Nemirovsky and Tam Dibley; Stephanie Bunn, Mary Crabb and Geraldine Jones; and Valeria Lembo.
Talks included work by:
- Stephanie Bunn (St Andrews)
- Ricardo Nemirovsky (Manchester Metropolitan University)
- Elizabeth de Freitas (Manchester Metropolitan University)
- Don Duprez (University of Edinburgh)
- Ester Gisbert Alemanay (University of Alicante)
- Dermott McMeel (Auckland)
- Beth Shotton (University College Dublin)
- Mike Anusas (University of Edinburgh)
- Dan Dubowitz (architect)
- Robin Schaeverbeke (KU Leuven).
The workshop is aimed towards publication and opening up new avenues of investigation parallel to Design Anthropology and Architectural Anthropology.
The next event will be a panel at the Association of Social Anthropologists in Oxford in September 2018.
Principal investigator: Łukasz Stanek
Funding: Stimuleringsfonds voor Architectuur (research fellowship and travel grant, 2006); the Berlage Institute (two conference grants, 2009), Jan van Eyck Academie (two conference grants, 2009), Adam Mickiewicz Institute (2014), Erste Stiftung (2014)
This is a comparative study of “real existing modernism”, that is to say post-Stalinist architecture in socialist Europe. I am studying the development of modernism in the condition of state socialism (with de-commodification of land, socialist governance models, and strategies of dissidence) but also the continuities in architectural culture in the region since the late 19th century.
- Łukasz Stanek ed. Team 10 East. Revisionist Architecture in Real Existing Modernism, Warsaw: Museum of Modern Art, distributed by Chicago: University of Chicago Press (2014), 250 pages, ISBN 978-83-64177-03-3
- Łukasz Stanek, Aleksandra Kędziorek, Architecture As a Pedagogical Object: What to Preserve of the Przyczółek Grochowski Housing Estate by Oskar & Zofia Hansen in Warsaw? Architektúra & Urbanizmus, no. 3—4 (December), 2012, 2—21, peer-reviewed
Principal investigator: Isabelle Doucet
Funding: SEED Research Stimulation Fund (2012), Methods@Manchester (2012-2013)
Counter-projects are drawing-manifestoes, originating in Brussels, and used throughout the 1970s for processing architectural critique and formulating alternatives. They operated at the intersections of urban politics, cultural history and architectural education. Counter-projects moreover assisted the consolidation of a Reconstruction of the European City movement around, amongst others, Léon Krier and Maurice Culot. This project focuses on the emergence and maturation of counter-projects, and their impact on architectural and urban production; in Brussels and in the wider European context.
Because counter-projects touch upon questions related to radical architectural education, the uses of the past, methods for critical action in architecture, and the relationship between politics and aesthetics, they are also instructive as critical devices in their own right. This project therefore revisits the activist-educational roots of counter-projects also beyond the traditionalist realm of the Reconstruction movement. With an initial focus on Brussels (La Cambre), London (The Architectural Association), and Manchester (The Manchester School of Architecture), I study counter-projects emanating from diverging ideological and conceptual stances in architectural education.
- Isabelle Doucet, 'Counter-projects and the postmodern user' in: Use Matters. An Alternative History of Architecture, ed. by Kenny Cupers, Routledge 2013, pp. 233-247
- Isabelle Doucet, 'Architecture between Politics and Aesthetics: Peter Wilson's "Ambivalent Criticality" at the Architectural Association in the 1970s', Architectural Theory Review, Volume 19, issue 1, 2014, pp. 98-115.
Principal investigator: Isabelle Doucet
Funding: Scientific Research and Innovation of Brussels, Prospective Research for Brussels Grant (2004-2008)
Confronted with a recent practice turn in architectural theory this project analyses critical and ethical operations within architecture that, instead of deploying distance and abstraction, operate in situated, relational, and embodied manners. By investigating modes of critical engagement that operate through practice, I challenge the fatalistic association of the practice turn in architecture with a post-political and post-theoretical turn.
This project is therefore a conceptual and methodological exploration into critical operations from-within. By extension, it revisits the possibilities for architectural theory to re-claim and reinvigorate its critical program.
This ambitious undertaking is divided in several sub-projects. These include the study of the relationship between theory and practice through the notion of agency and transdisciplinarity. It also theorises the translation of relational and pragmatist perspectives into architectural theory and the consequent opportunities and threats for critical architecture.
Finally, I study the potential of critical action from-within through concrete critical operations, such as those in Brussels after 1968.
- Isabelle Doucet and Nel Janssens, eds., Transdisciplinary Knowledge Production in Architecture and Urbanism. Towards Hybrid Modes of Inquiry (Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, Urban and Landscape Perspective Series, 2011).
- Isabelle Doucet and Kenny Cupers, eds. ‘Agency in Architecture: Reframing Criticality in Theory and Practice’, special issue, Footprint Journal, Issue 4, Spring 2009.
- Isabelle Doucet, ‘Making a city with words. Understanding Brussels through its urban heroes and villains’, City, Culture, and Society, volume 3, issue 2, 2012, pp. 105-116.
- Isabelle Doucet, ‘Learning from Brussels. An irreductive approach to architectural and urban problématiques?’, Belgeo, 2011, issue 1-2, pp. 29-39.
- Forthcoming book manuscript (2015) on the practice turn in architecture, using case studies from Brussels after 1968.
- Principal investigator: Ray Lucas
- Dates: May 2014 - May 2018 (ongoing)
- Funding: European Research Council (as part of KFI)
This project began as an ad-hoc investigation during a visit to Chiba for the IUAES conference in 2014 and has been supported by further funding from the ERC project, Knowing From the Inside.
The project involves an investigation of the ways in which the festival and processions of Mikoshi (portable shrines) take over an entire district of Tokyo for three days every year as a kind of embodied urbanism.
The project covers:
- temporary occupations of the city
- the material culture of the festival
- transformations of everyday space
- the collapse of sacred and profane space
- neighbourhood bonds and belonging
- portable buildings
- interactions between legitimate and illegitimate authority.
Outputs have been exhibition-based so far, with two chapters in edited volumes due in 2018.
Principal investigator: Leandro Minuchin
Funding: National Research Council (Ecuador, Senecyt)
The project examines the conceptual trajectory of the right to the city in Latin America and describes the limits and tensions of the current normative phase. The research revisits Lefebvre’s original theorizations to illuminate the role infrastructures of proximity play in the unfolding of everyday practices in popular settlements. The research investigates alternative construction systems for housing provision in Ecuador.
Working together with the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development in Ecuador and a local NGO in Guayaquil, the research developed a housing typology for Monte Sinaí, that included the following characteristics:
- standardised panels for affordable progressive adaptations,
- local production of building components, and
- visual methods to register local construction practices.
As an output, a housing prototype in Guayaquil was built and a contract between MIDUVI and the local NGO to construct 320 additional units has been signed.
- SEED Strategic Research Support Funds 2018-19 – Early Career Call
- Monash Art Design & Architecture (MADA) 2019 creative residencies
Using the frame of mass communications and technological development, this research explores the cultural history of television in its intersection with notions of space and architecture, in the period spanning from the early 1970s to the late 1990s. Concerned more broadly with popular culture and its impact on architecture during the period commonly called “postmodernism”, this project looks not so much at the ways in which architecture has been portrayed in television, but rather at the impact of television - and the apparatus behind it - on the shaping of cities, on architecture and interior spaces, as well as on the production and consumption of aesthetics, though notions of display, performativeness and spectatorship.
On Air: British Television and the Construction of Postmodern Space, 1970s to 1990s aims to investigate the commercialisation and diversification of television from the 1970s onwards. Starting from studies concerned with the introduction of television in the post-war era, this historical and theoretical investigation will go beyond the impact of television as a catalyst for renewed domestic values and familiar togetherness in the 1950s and 1960s, to provide new ways of approaching the relationship between private and public, the home and the city, consumer culture and spectatorship, a couple of decades after the introduction of television.
Pathways, Practices and Architectures: Containing Antimicrobial Resistance in the Cystic Fibrosis Clinic
- Principal investigator: Professor Nik Brown (University of York)
- Co-investigators: Professor Sarah Nettleton, Dr Daryl Martin, Dr Alan Lewis
- Researcher: Dr Christina Buse
- Funding: Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC)
Antibiotics may suppress infections without eliminating them, giving rise to antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria and cross-infection between people.
This project is both timely and important because of the increasing numbers of bacteria acquiring resistance to existing antibiotics.
Our research compares the way three outpatient lung infection clinics attempt to control AMR and cross-infection through the design, practices and architectural layout of their built environments. It further seeks to learn lessons from this to limit AMR in wider healthcare settings.
Principal investigator: Łukasz Stanek
Funding: Funded by ETH Zurich (research fellowship, 2010), Museum of Modern Art in Warsaw (research fellowship and exhibition grants, 2009—2011), Berlage Institute (conference grant, 2010), Mondriaan Fonds (exhibition grant, 2010), CASCO Utrecht (travel fellowship, 2012), Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University (2014)
I am studying the emergence of modernism as the techno-cultural mode of urbanization becoming a global phenomenon during the Cold War. Global modernism was produced by multiple, and often competing, networks of world-wide cooperation, which, besides Western “globalization”, included socialist internationalism, the Non-Aligned Movement, and Pan-African cooperation. With case studies from Eastern Europe, Africa and the Middle East, I am interested in distributed authorship, network analysis, planetary urbanization, and new products of architectural labour since the 1960s.
- Łukasz Stanek, Miastoprojekt Goes Abroad. Transfer of Architectural Labor from Socialist Poland to Iraq (1958—1989), The Journal of Architecture (London), Vol. 17, No. 3, 2012, pp. 361—86, peer-reviewed
- Łukasz Stanek, Second World’s Architecture and Planning in the Third World, introduction to the volume Cold War Transfer. Architecture and Planning from Socialist Countries in the “Third World”, edited by Łukasz Stanek and Tom Avermaete, The Journal of Architecture (London), Vol. 17, No. 3, 2012, pp. 299—307, peer-reviewed
- Łukasz Stanek, Postmodernism Is Almost All Right. Polish Architecture after Socialist Globalization, Warsaw: Fundacja Bęc-Zmiana (2012), 96 pages, ISBN 978-83-62418-14-5
Principal investigator: Deljana Iossifova
- Ulysses Sengupta (Manchester Metropolitan University)
- Murilo da Silva Baptista (University of Aberdeen)
- Christopher Doll (United Nations University)
- Alexandros Gasparatos (University of Tokyo)
- Robert Hyde (Manchester Metropolitan University)
- Roberto Kraenkel (Sao Paulo State University)
- Nir Oren (University of Aberdeen)
- Panagiotis Angeloudis (Imperial College London)
- Shidan Cheng (Wuhan University)
- Daniel Graham (Imperial College London)
- Jun Luo (Wuhan University)
- Association of Greater Manchester Authorities
- Future Cities Catapult
- Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce
- Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA)
Funding: Economic and Social Research Council (2015), £100,799
The ESRC Strategic Network ‘Data and Cities as Complex Adaptive Systems’ (DACAS) seeks to progress an integrated approach to the study, planning and design of cities.
Despite increasing attention on the application of new information flows to the design and development of ‘smart’ cities, our understanding of the interconnections between ‘hard’ infrastructure and economic, ecological and social systems in urban areas remains limited.
DACAS brings together an international group of researchers from a range of different fields to support the development of an innovative and cross-disciplinary set of tools to gather, integrate and interpret a wide range of emerging data sources. Findings will benefit policy-makers, academics and other actors seeking to develop evidence-based responses to urban issues using open data.
The project develops in a series of events and workshops in Manchester, Sao Paulo and Wuhan:
- Cities as Complex Systems, Launch, Manchester Metropolitan University, 1-3 February 2016
- Modelling Urban Systems, Workshop, Sao Paulo State University, 20-24 June 2016
- Understanding Urban Transformations through Data, Summer School, University of Manchester, 12-16 September 2016
- Digital Tools for Urban Challenges, Workshop, Wuhan University, 24-28 October 2016
- Principal investigator: Stephen Walker
- Funders: RIBA Research Trust Award
This project explores the architecture of the street fair.
Everyone has some experience of fairs; it is an accessible topic of interest to a wide range of people. Less obvious is how the fair and market — the events around which many towns and cities grew up — influenced the formation of permanent architectural and urban fabric. When the fair returns, this fabric disappears into the apparent (and willingly accepted) chaos of fairground experience. Underlying this, though invisible to the public, there are extensive influences and multi-layered rules governing the fair’s environment.
Working mainly with examples from the ‘Backend Run’ of English fairs, this project examines the spatial organization of the street fair as a whole, with the aim of understanding various aspects of the environment itself, and the relationships it enjoys with its socio-political, legislative and physical contexts, and with its public.
Principal investigator: Stephen Walker
As part of my ongoing research into the relationship between art and architectural practice and theory, I am currently working on the Bristol-based interdisciplinary practice Warren & Mosley.
Aspects of their work concerning their project “Rogue Game” (2010 and ongoing) were presented as part of the research project 'Is Architecture Art?' funded by a Discovery Grant of the Australian Research Council (ARC) and based at the Centre for Architecture, Theory, History and Criticism (ATCH), at the School of Architecture, University of Queensland, in partnership with Ghent University at a conference organised in collaboration with the Royal Academy of Arts (KASK), Ghent.
More recently, this work is developing by considering the mediation of utopia as this operates in their works Utopian Building Consent; Beyond Utopia; and Utopian Talk Show.